Select Page
Two developers talk through agentic AI workflows

Usability Testing for Agentic Interactions: Ensuring Intuitive AI-Powered Smart Device Assistants

The line between question-answering chatbots, simple automation, and true agentic AI is blurring as smart devices become more sophisticated. Today’s AI-powered assistants — whether embedded in your home, car or phone — are expected to do more than answer basic questions or follow commands. With agentic AI expanding the limitations of general chatbots, the number of use cases multiplies, enabling these systems to autonomously plan, execute, and adapt across a wide range of scenarios. They must understand, adapt and interact with users in ways that feel natural, helpful and trustworthy. 

With these expanded use cases come new risks and opportunities for error. As we move beyond IoT into a world of intuitive, intelligent device assistants, robust usability testing across diverse audiences and real-world scenarios and user feedback become essential.

For example, a smart home agent might not only answer questions about the weather, but also proactively adjust lighting, security, and energy usage based on your habits and preferences. Each of these interactions and adjustments introduces the potential for error. 

Why usability matters for agentic AI

Agentic AI systems such as LLM-enhanced chatbots and intuitive smart assistants interact directly with users and often make autonomous decisions. Their success hinges on delivering experiences that are not only technically accurate but also accessible, intelligent and emotionally resonant. Poor usability and failure to grasp user intent can erode trust, frustrate users, and undermine the value of even the most advanced AI.

Usability can be measured through metrics such as user satisfaction, task completion rates, error frequency, and the system’s ability to handle edge cases or ambiguous requests.

Unique challenges in testing agentic interactions

Unlike traditional software, agentic AI interfaces are dynamic and adaptive. They learn from user behavior, personalize responses, and sometimes even anticipate needs. This complexity introduces new challenges for usability testing:

  • Transparency and trust: Users must understand why the AI makes certain decisions. Opaque reasoning can lead to confusion or distrust.
  • Personalization: The system should adapt to individual preferences without becoming unpredictable or inconsistent.
  • Emotional resonance: AI outputs must not only be correct but also perceived as helpful and empathetic.
  • Accessibility: Experiences must be inclusive, working seamlessly for users of all abilities and backgrounds. This is especially true for customer service and sectors like banking, which must be available to all people.
  • Multi-agent interactions: In multi-agent environments, where smaller LLMs specialize in distinct functions (retrieval, planning, execution), the margin for error multiplies—especially at the seams where handoffs occur.

These challenges call for a reimagined approach to usability testing — one that accounts for both the complexity of the systems and the expectations of their users.

Best practices for usability testing of tool-using agentic AI

Before testing begins, define the core objectives for your AI agent: What problems is it solving, and what outcomes matter most? Establish clear metrics — such as accuracy, response time, user satisfaction, and fairness—to ensure your testing aligns with both user needs and business goals.

Here are five best practices tailored for these advanced agents:

  1. Scenario-based task execution testing
    Simulate real-world workflows where the agent must autonomously select and use external tools (APIs, web services, device controls) to accomplish user goals. Evaluate the agent’s ability to handle multi-step tasks, recover from tool failures, and manage edge cases—ensuring actions align with user intent and expectations. For example, test how an agent handles booking a flight while adjusting smart home devices in response to last-minute travel plans.
  2. Transparency and action traceability
    Test whether the agent provides clear, user-facing explanations for each action it takes on the user’s behalf. Users should be able to review, understand, and, if needed, reverse or modify actions. Comprehensive logging and transparent reporting are essential for building trust and diagnosing issues.
  3. Safety, security and permission controls
    Evaluate the robustness of permission prompts, user consent flows, and safeguards for sensitive or high-risk actions (e.g., payments, data deletion). Test how the agent handles ambiguous or conflicting instructions, ensuring it defaults to safe, user-confirmed behaviors and respects boundaries.
  4. Component-level and end-to-end integration testing
    Carefully test integration points — where agent components hand off data or invoke external systems — for data consistency, error propagation, and user experience continuity. This is especially critical in multi-agent or tool-using architectures, where small breakdowns can cascade across the workflow.
  5. Human feedback and continuous monitoring
    Incorporate human-in-the-loop evaluation for high-stakes or novel scenarios, and establish continuous monitoring for emergent or adversarial behaviors. Use both automated and human feedback to iteratively improve the agent’s reliability, safety, and user alignment over time. Test how smoothly the AI transitions tasks to human agents in ambiguous or high-stakes scenarios, ensuring users never feel abandoned or trapped by automation.

Post-deployment monitoring and rapid iteration cycles are critical for adapting to new user needs and emerging risks. Usability doesn’t end at launch—it evolves with how users interact with the agent over time.

Establish trust in agentic workflows from the start

From a human-centered AI perspective, trust is the cornerstone of successful agentic workflows. Prioritizing transparency, user feedback, and ethical design from the very beginning ensures that AI agents act as reliable partners, not just tools. Early usability testing is a critical investment in building systems that respect user autonomy and enhance collaboration.

Collect detailed feedback from testers, including screenshots and transcripts, and create a transparent process for tracking improvements. Usability is an ongoing journey — continuous updates and real-world monitoring are essential for long-term success.

To build agentic systems that users actually trust, teams must prioritize explainability, ethical oversight, and robust governance from the start. That means making actions traceable, ensuring decisions are reviewable, embedding inclusive design, and piloting with real users. When done right, these efforts don’t just mitigate risk—they foster relationships between users and AI agents that feel collaborative, not coercive.

At Applause, we help teams turn these principles into practice — providing feedback that can shape agentic experiences that users trust and adopt. 

Let’s build better agents together.

Want to see more like this?
Published: May 14, 2025
Reading Time: 7 min

Do Your IVR And Chatbot Experiences Empower Your Customers?

A recent webinar offers key points for organizations to consider as they evaluate the effectiveness of their customer-facing IVRs and chatbots.

Agentic Workflows in the Enterprise

As the level of interest in building agentic workflows in the enterprise increases, there is a corresponding development in the “AI Stack” that enables agentic deployments at scale.

What is Agentic AI?

Learn what differentiates agentic AI from generative AI and traditional AI and how agentic raises the stakes for software developers.

How Crowdtesters Reveal AI Chatbot Blind Spots

You can’t fix what AI can’t see

A Snapshot of the State of Digital Quality in AI

Explore the results of our annual survey on trends in developing and testing AI applications, and how those applications are living up to consumer expectations.

How Community Testing Can Help Expose Hidden AI/ML Challenges

Ensure AI/ML solutions perform accurately and equitably
No results found.